ClarityLift vs Microsoft Viva Glint

Cost of voluntary turnover is already in your P&L

Gallup puts the global cost of disengagement at $8.8T per year — about nine percent of global GDP (Gallup, State of the Global Workplace 2025). Voluntary turnover is the visible piece. Every retained mid-tenure employee is a recruiting fee plus a ramp curve plus an institutional-knowledge transfer your finance team does not have to absorb.

Continuous signal vs. point-in-time survey ROI

A once-a-year engagement survey gives you one data point. ClarityLift surfaces the same shape of signal continuously, on the daily collaboration data that already exists. The math the calculator at /roi runs is the headcount × voluntary-quit rate × earlier-detection delta — every input cited.

Contract consolidation, not stack expansion

Aggregate signal that your survey vendor cannot produce. Aggregate dashboards your HRIS cannot generate. Most mid-market customers consolidate bolt-on listening or analytics tools when they bring ClarityLift in alongside their existing survey program.

Validates the survey you are already running

The survey gives you what people say. ClarityLift gives you the daily signal that tells you whether the survey result matches what is actually happening on the team. Coexist with Culture Amp, Lattice, Glint, or whatever is already in place — no rip-and-pull, no team-wide change-management lift, and no asking the CEO to walk back the survey program they already approved.

No individual surveillance, by construction

Aggregate-only with a structurally enforced minimum group size of ten. No DMs ingested, ever. No individual scores, no per-person dashboards, no ability for an admin to flip a switch and see one employee. The privacy posture is a design constraint, not a policy choice — independently verifiable in our public privacy architecture documentation.

Compliance posture is defensible

Retention-zero on message text. HRIS connector-level whitelist that never requests protected-class fields. We deliberately avoid the language and feature shape that triggers the Colorado AI Act high-risk scope. Every claim on the privacy page is tied to a code-level invariant we can show counsel.